Senior journalist Sohail Wadiach also responded to a statement issued by DGISPR

Lahore(94 news) Senior journalist and analyst Sohail Waraich while reacting to the statement on behalf of DG ISPR has said that Mr. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry has personal respect in my heart. He is very pleasant in personal meetings, but the things he denied were not mentioned in the above-mentioned column, perhaps he spoke on the basis of misunderstanding that I may have some personal benefit in this column? If there is still any question in this regard, I am always available to clarify it.

It should be noted that in the statement issued by DG ISPR, it was said that the field marshal did not make any political speech in Brussels and did not mention any apology. There were hundreds of people at the event. Photographs have been made with hundreds of people. No interview was given to anyone, their conversation was distorted and presented as an interview, the senior journalist showed irresponsibility.

On Twitter, Suhail Warraich said that Zulfi Bukhari, the greatest and talented leader of Tehreek-e-Insaf Overseas, said Suhail Warraich is destroyed. (Sohail Waraich was destroyed, wasted) . As a journalistic tradition, I did not respond to the campaign launched against me by PTI trolls and dollar-earning vloggers as "tout", "army agent", "bathroom cleaner" for five days, nor will I respond to those who distort my 40 years of journalistic history. There is no need for any comment or reply regarding personal accusations, the coming time and the history to be written will clarify every matter. I have always avoided fighting in life and I still hold this opinion after much thought.

He said that Mr. Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry has personal respect in my heart. He is very pleasant in personal meetings, but the things he denied were not mentioned in the above mentioned column, maybe he spoke on the basis of misunderstanding that I might have some personal benefit in this column?? If there is still any question in this regard, I am always available to clarify it. He authentically said that the field marshal did not give any interview, read my entire column again, the word interview is not used anywhere in it. The title of my column is the first meeting, nothing more and nothing less. I have not written anywhere that this was a one-to-one meeting. There were 800 attendees at the event, neither there nor the conversation over dinner in front of a few people was off the record. There was no talk about May 9, Imran Khan and the apology. This is absolutely true. Please re-read this column, there is no mention of Imran Khan and his apology from the end of May 9. I wrote only one sentence that he presented verses of Quran and their translation regarding political reconciliation. Now what impression people and trollers took from it is their choice. If one has it in his own mind, it depends on his will.

He said that as the lowest journalistic worker, in my opinion, both journalism and politics are children of democracy as well as neighbours. But there is no revolving door between the two houses, there is a solid wall. This holy wall cannot be crossed without jumping. Unfortunately, political workers have jumped over the wall of journalism and made its yard a road. According to Professor Nusrat Javed, I am a carporter, so my limits are journalistic, Josna and wrote what I saw. After writing the account of the first meeting with the field marshal, the ideological leader of Tehreek-e-Insaf and my "long-time benefactor" Shehbaz Gul and the country's veterans Heer and Faisal Vawda both came back to the same page, when both of them used to share a common love for Imran, both of them kept rejecting my column. The revolutionaries Hammad Azhar, Noni Mutwale and Jayale are all calling me Khosamdi and Jangjeev irresponsible. I confess that they all The accusations of the mercenaries are 100% true, I am an old habitual criminal, all of them against me prove my blackness and their good deeds. I am a lowly and humble writer, while my critics are much higher than me in position, rank and greatness, I confess that my sins did not begin today. Now that I have become repentant, complacent, traitorous, taut and irresponsible, I will also confess to the rest of the crimes so that the punishment is met together.

Sohail Waraich said that the column on the first meeting with the Field Marshal is not my first crime. This wretch had published the charge sheet of General Zia-ul-Haq against Mohammad Khan Junejo in the last years of the 80s. Many senior journalists of Lahore were present in this speech held in the Madrasa of Sheikhupura. Ziaul Haq transferred as a lecturer to Tunis, his story is different. When Nawaz Sharif was exiled, there was a ban on publishing even his name. This black car was the first journalist who went to Jeddah to meet Mian Nawaz Sharif. His interview and situation were published in Daily Jang magazine, then General Musharraf was very angry. When General Musharraf was in power, my story of Nawaz Sharif was published in the name of his book "Ghaddar Kon", General Musharraf gave an interview against him in Daily Time, but when General Musharraf left power, he went to London and gave his first interview.

He said that even though when I conducted these interviews with Nawaz Sharif and General Musharraf, at that time both were angry with Jang and Jiu, yet these interviews were published and broadcast. General Bajwa was very fond of meetings, he must have met many journalists, but the first sin of writing "Bajwa Doctrine" was committed by me. On the first day, General Bajwa was happy with this writing, but after a week, he was so angry that he never even met. He wrote "Party Azawar" during Nawaz Sharif's tenure. "Gee" Twanasafi got angry, really the sins of this humble person are countless. I did the last interview of Dr. Qadeer Khan sitting on the footpath and his punishment is also now obligatory. The rest of the Brussels meeting was about Quranic verses, forgiveness, angels and Satan's talk. This was a fragment of the field marshal's speech. My personal desire is for reconciliation and national stability, although according to all the information I have received for two and a half years, there is no scope for reconciliation, forgiveness and any agreement, but shouldn't a sinner express his desire? Therefore, nothing positive can be obtained from negative thinking and negative tactics. Suppose if someone disagrees with me, don't I have the right to say it? Isn't it a fascist attitude to suppress others with accusations and threats, in fact Vawda, Hamad Azhar and a few YouTubers have not grown up in any political or journalistic nursery and are not convinced of political and journalistic principles. All of them have been students of Askari Faiz school of the past. And maybe they want to bring back the same era, those who put their noses on my column continue to make arbitrary interpretations and artificial interpretations to achieve their own goals and interests. As time progresses, the truth of everyone will be revealed, history is the only source that exposes false claims, fake truths and so-called accusations. The verdict of history will be in favor of journalism.